New research has complicated the debate about global warming

 

It is not surprising that many people believe cause global warming is only one human activity, as it believes the majority of scientists. But professionals should wonder why there is still a large group of those who “deny” for which anthropogenic climate change is fiction.


The fact that scientists are not just caught in the machinations of climate data and ridiculous predictions. Celebrities and politicians who support the scientists living in luxurious mansions, fly around in private jets, and in General due to their lifestyle, the atmosphere gets much more CO2 than the activities of ordinary people. As with all this in mind, you can take global warming seriously?

Does not save the situation and the fact that respected scientists doubt the existence of global warming. Recently, two Australian researchers published an article in which he explained that today’s temperature changes in the world quite naturally.

Scientist Jennifer Maras in a large list of achievements which is the Foundation of the laboratory for studying climate The Climate Modeling Laboratory, begins his sweeping report, referring to reality.
“Our new research will likely ignore”, – reads the text of the article in the edition of The Spectator Australia.

She goes on to explain: “having Examined the proxy temperature data of six periods for 2000 years, we came to the conclusion that the recent warming is a natural process that would happen even if the technical revolution had happened”.

The difficulty is that in the middle ages the global temperatures were indeed higher, and many years it remained a fact that the proponents of global warming today deny. These researchers confirm that before the industrial revolution the world was warmer. Of course, in this regard, it is assumed that human activity affects the climate much less than I think environmentallyinfluence.

On the temperature chart, you notice two periods of increase: the first one took about 1200 years and is known as the Medieval climatic optimum, and the second peaked in 1980, after which the temperature began to decline…

See also:

However, there is abundant evidence that during the Medieval climatic optimum in Europe was approximately one degree warmer, and this corresponds to a temperature increase in the Northern hemisphere in the year 1200. Published a huge number of reports based on proxy data, which indicate higher temperatures of this period.

Most importantly, the debate about climate change is not yet complete, scientists have not come to a consensus (but even if they managed to reach a consensus, it should be remembered that a large number of people in the veracity of the fact does not guarantee its accuracy).

Share
The Stopru